DOCTOR PUNDIT » Minnesota

Minn. Nurses Reach Agreement with Hospitals, Contracts Ratified

Michael Douglas, MD, MBA — Wed, 07 Jul 2010 19:27:02 +0000

Twin Cities nurses have averted a strike, and today, they and the hospitals they fought long and hard with on the issue of staffing ratios and patient safety have agreed to a contract ratification. Bittersweet for the nurses. They did not have to go through what was (for some) an indignity, further exacerbating what was amounting to an increasingly newsworthy credibility gap among patients and families; but they did concede their signature issue — and some see that as a political and PR loss.

[Union negotiator Kevin] Campbell said he realized at that point that the hospitals were not prepared to discuss staffing the way the union hoped. In that case, he said, “it is not in the best interest of nurses or patients to pursue it.”He said the union would turn to the Legislature for help, as nurses successfully did in California. “They could end up like California, where the Legislature crammed it down their throats,” he said.

That’s right. The next step for the MNA could be the MN state legislature. Seems like its time for all three Dem candidates to start stumping for union votes right here ahead of next month’s primary if the nursing bargaining unit has a shot in ultimately getting what it set out to do, even if caution and dignity have fallen by the wayside. | LINK

Minnesota Nurses Overwhelmingly Reject Twin Cities Hospitals’ Proposals It’s being billed as the biggest nursing strike in this...
Nurses to Vote Next Week on Whether to Extend Walkout The real (as opposed to symbolic) battle lines have been...
Twin Cities Hospitals, Nurses Reach Agreement; Averting Strike An agreement has been reached between the Minnesota Nurses Association...

Friday Newswire: Veterans’ Health at Risk in HIV Flap & More

Michael Douglas, MD, MBA — Fri, 02 Jul 2010 13:29:26 +0000

Some headlines prior to the Independence Day holiday. Normal posting resumes here at Doctor Pundit on July 6. Have a happy and safe holiday weekend!

Veterans Admin admits to the debacle surrounding dirty dental instruments placing hundreds of patients at risk of HIV transmission. [LINK]
Minnesota nursing strike may be averted, but time will tell if threat to strike was more of a bluff. Hospitals and nurses pledged to work within the constraints of internal governance. [LINK]
How’s healthcare reform going? Just fine, according to some. [LINK]
How influential will states’ insurance commissions be when regulating insurers’ medical loss ratios in the age of reform?

The medical-loss ratio measures how much of premiums insurers pay out for medical care versus administrative costs. The new law requires that insurers use at least 80% of the premiums from individuals and small businesses to pay for medical care and profit-taking, and 85% of premiums from larger employers. Health insurers are waiting for regulators to clarify how companies must account for the numbers—whether they can average the MLRs of their subsidiaries, for instance.

[LINK]
Study: Genes key to longevity. [LINK]

Friday Newswire: Alzheimer Research & More The Wellpoint saga continues…as well as the blame game for...
Tuesday Newswire: MN Nurses Overwhelmingly Approve Move to Strike & More It’s on. The mega union only needed 66%. They got...
Friday Newswire: The FDA & Medical Device Approval & More Minnesota man gets prison time for trying to scam one...

Senate Rejection of Unemployment Extension Means Fears of Near-Term Dropped Medicaid Funding for States

Michael Douglas, MD, MBA — Sat, 26 Jun 2010 14:47:29 +0000

The U.S. Senate is the target of criticism of budgetary concerns on the left and on the right, as the weekend before most states’ new fiscal years begin. At issue is the stalled bill on unemployment benefits and extensions, which was the outcome of hours of debate and an ultimate (mostly) party line vote to block future consideration. States’ Medicaid packages were to figure in heavily, as many government-run healthcare programs were in dire need of funding in the face of the alternative — severe budget cuts in not only the state level, but also the local and municipal levels. Governors on both sides of the ideological aisle decried the Senate’s rejection of aid to their states in the form of another six months of Medicaid assistance. (Here in Minnesota, our governor has already rejected the earmark of funds as part of the balanced budget for this biennium.)

Also,

Making the situation more difficult for states, the recent passage of the federal health care overhaul bars them from rolling back eligibility on Medicaid, so the cuts would have to come from elsewhere in their budgets — and would likely include layoffs from different parts of the state governments, many of which have already seen big cuts — or by slashing things like payments to Medicaid providers.

Will governors have to go to Washington to lobby for the inclusion of this provision in this latest legislative battle? Unless the bill is revived next week in the House in an effort to address this critical setback, the issue of Medicaid financing will suddenly become much more complicated than it usually is this time of year. After all, state budgets have to be balanced. | LINK

Funding Long Term Care — An Issue Missing from the Current Healthcare Reform Debate The relationship between Medicare funding/reimbursement patterns and nursing home operational...
Minnesota’s Medicaid Program to Face Certain Significant Budgetary Cuts When Minnesota Governor Tim Pawlenty gets ready to address the...
Obama Will Release $15 Billion from Federal Stimulus Package to States for Immediate Medicaid Funding in Two Days It’s official. Barack Obama will begin doling out the almost...

Tuesday Newswire: MN Nurses Overwhelmingly Approve Move to Strike & More

Michael Douglas, MD, MBA — Tue, 22 Jun 2010 13:17:45 +0000

It’s on. The mega union only needed 66%. They got over 80% ‘yea’. [LINK]
At ninety days into the new reform law, Obama makes public safeguards inherent within. [LINK]
FDA approves new diagnostic test that more rapidly detects antibodies and antigens. Excellent. [LINK]
More controversy than there needs to be? The president’s pick to be new CMS chief engenders strong feelings on both sides [LINK]

Hospital executives who have worked with Dr. Berwick describe him as a visionary, inspiring leader. [..] Republicans are using the nomination to revive their arguments against the new health care law, which they see as a potent issue in this fall’s elections, and Dr. Berwick has given them plenty of ammunition. In two decades as a professor of health policy and as a prolific writer, he has spoken of the need to ration health care and cap spending and has confessed to a love affair with the British health care system.

Obama’s Presumptive CMS Appointee in for Stringent Confirmation Process Ordinarily, the nomination by the president of a candidate to...
Friday Newswire: Veterans’ Health at Risk in HIV Flap & More Some headlines prior to the Independence Day holiday. Normal posting...
Minnesota Nurses Overwhelmingly Reject Twin Cities Hospitals’ Proposals It’s being billed as the biggest nursing strike in this...

Nurses to Vote Next Week on Whether to Extend Walkout

Michael Douglas, MD, MBA — Tue, 15 Jun 2010 10:39:55 +0000

The real (as opposed to symbolic) battle lines have been drawn. Twin Cities nurses, who recently voted to walk out for 1 day last week in a show of mutual support for changes in staffing conditions on the premise of improving patient care, will again vote next Monday to walk out indefinitely. The one-day strike led to the conclusion that the hospitals were essentially operating in the black and weathering the recession against short-term losses to reap longer-term gains. Nursing contends that their employers — represented by 14 metro area hospitals — are just sitting on profits as patient care suffers at current oppressive staffing ratios and less than desirable pay conditions.

The ball has always been the nurses’ court. Now they must act. But do they have the full support of its collective?

The prospect of an open-ended strike had already ignited a debate on the [Minn. Nurses Association]‘s Facebook page late Monday. One post called for nurses to “march on,” while another cautioned against becoming “sheep to be led to the slaughter.”

Will the sixty-six percent yea vote needed to effect a new date for an indefinite walkout occur? We’ll see. For every day until that vote takes place, the mega union must convince patients — well, more like the public — that what they are proposing is in the best interest of the community, the patients, and most importantly — the overall state of healthcare as a bastion of quality performed in a cost-effective manner. | LINK

Twin Cities Hospitals, Nurses Reach Agreement; Averting Strike An agreement has been reached between the Minnesota Nurses Association...
Twin Cities Hospitals Brace for Strike Reality While it is no surprise that the latest negotiations among...
Minnesota Nurses Overwhelmingly Reject Twin Cities Hospitals’ Proposals It’s being billed as the biggest nursing strike in this...

Twin Cities Nurses Up the Ante in PR Stakes Ahead of Possible Strike

Michael Douglas, MD, MBA — Tue, 08 Jun 2010 03:53:27 +0000

The 12000-member nursing mega-union is playing PR hardball, going after the emotional jugular in advance of a walkout over staffing demands that seems all but certain.

In a news release Monday, the union cited several examples of what it calls dangerous staffing. Among them: a nurse at Methodist Hospital in St. Louis Park who said a dying patient “had to sit in his own feces” because no one was available to clean him up, and a nurse at Mercy Hospital in Coon Rapids who called for help when a patient’s surgical incision ripped open, “but nobody came.”

An expected and noble strategy, but one that could backfire. Although tableaus of patient horror stories like these evoke a visceral response, assigning these incidents to something as isolated, discrete, and simple as staffing inequities irresponsibly assumes public ignorance of the end product of something more insidious and global — a broken healthcare delivery system that yearns to be fixed via negotiation and cooperation, not bullying and scare tactics. Twin Citians as citizens and patients can easily understand that. | LINK

Update on Twin Cities Nurses’ Threat to Strike The June 1 deadline for a walkout imposed by the...
Minnesota Nurses Overwhelmingly Reject Twin Cities Hospitals’ Proposals It’s being billed as the biggest nursing strike in this...
Twin Cities Hospitals, Nurses Reach Agreement; Averting Strike An agreement has been reached between the Minnesota Nurses Association...

Supreme Court to Hear Univ. Of MN Case Involving Tax Policies on Medical Residents’ Earnings

Michael Douglas, MD, MBA — Wed, 02 Jun 2010 10:48:33 +0000

Medical residents are students of medicine. Medical residents are physicians in training. Is it one or the other, or both? For the purposes of the plaintiffs, the University of Minnesota will take up the issue of whether Social Security taxation applies to them before the U.S. Supreme Court. Thanks to a joint filing from the Mayo Foundation for Medical Education and the U of M, the SCOTUS will hear the case — whose bases stretch back some twenty years.

At issue: the potential for upwards of $700M or more yearly in income that would be gained in the U’s budget (and in training programs nationwide) if an exemption on residents is granted with respect to Social Security taxes. The Treasury Dept., which houses the Internal Revenue Service, currently taxes resdients’ incomes; the Internal Revenue Service asserts that doctors in training, and the teaching hospitals that train them, must pay Social Security taxes on the residents’ stipends (incomes).

Residents are taxed at 7.5 percent — as they are considered employees of their training program. Oral arguments could begin in as little as six months. President Obama’s current nominee, Elena Kagan, would not take part in such deliberations because she is part of a brief supporting the federal government’s stance. | LINK

Medical Student Org Publicizes Medical Schools’ Pharma Policies In a way, the “predation” of pharma companies on medical...
Study: Reducing Medical Residents’ Hours Would Cost $2.5B Annually Patients who are cared for in teaching hospitals in this...
New Rules for Shorter Work Days for Residents Proposed by Accrediting Body Most attending physicians well out of training know of the...

Minnesota Safety Net Program Begins Challenging Phase in Order to Stay Afloat

Michael Douglas, MD, MBA — Tue, 01 Jun 2010 11:53:13 +0000

Until today the major significance of June 1 was important for two healthcare policy-related developments: the initiation of the restructured GAMC safety net here in Minnesota, and the one-day nursing walkout. Since the latter is rescheduled for the 10th, the former kicks off today with as much uncertainty for its future stability as those ongoing nursing-hospital talks are currently demonstrating.

With the new focus of GAMC as one of operating within a strict healthcare (capitated) budget of sorts, many beneficiaries of the program in its former incarnation are not only finding it as challenging to negotiate it in order to retain the level of care they have gotten used to; they are also realizing that its current policy is somewhat finite and inflexible.

That is, until they are able to take advantage of a state-run program using matched federal funds later this year, they are realizing that access to that care has just become as complicated — almost intentionally so. Such is the case of a Duluth man with schizophrenia who now has to travel to the Twin Cities in order to receive the care he has become accustomed to, by necessity.

“I don’t really like the idea of going to the Twin Cities, but I need comprehensive care,” said [John] Micklick, who suffers from mental illness and several chronic conditions. “I’ve got to be careful, because I know if things get too stressful, that’s when I start hearing things and seeing things.”

[...]

But like thousands of others who live outside the metro area, Micklick’s choices for medical care are: Get help at his local hospital emergency room, look for clinics willing to give free care or commute to the Twin Cities.

Not much room for choice, as an initial wish-list by the state of participating providers has been slashed from almost twenty throughout greater Minnesota to just four in the Twin Cities metro — also out of economic necessity. Until a new governor is installed this fall, care access under this program will continue to be a challenge. Although, this will relax once federal funds and (promised) higher reimbursement rates for providers kick in, it is no guarantee that the level of subsidized care for poor childless adults who qualify for the program will benefit in exactly the same way — even if that governor becomes a Democrat. The constantly fluctuating nature of healthcare reform will see to that. | LINK

Minnesota Hospital May Be Ultimate Arbiter in State’s Ability to Provide Safety Net Care to Poor The state’s largest acute care medical safety net, Hennepin County...
Minnesota’s Medicaid Program to Face Certain Significant Budgetary Cuts When Minnesota Governor Tim Pawlenty gets ready to address the...
A Minnesota Hospital Personifies Proposed Cuts to Its Safety Net Services What’s one way to get the attention of a Republican...

In Minnesota, Tales of Failed Legislative Attempts at Healthcare Reform and Possible Nursing Strike Loom Large

Michael Douglas, MD, MBA — Sun, 16 May 2010 16:10:17 +0000

Healthcare legislation in Minnesota is coming down to the wire. Sure, the governor has okayed legislation to allow alcohol in the University’s football stadium, but he has promised to veto any bill brought forth by the Dem-controlled lawmaking body that he says will cost the state dearly if its Medicaid program is expanded. GOP lawmakers (in the minority) do not support such a move, leaving the governor well-positioned to uphold his threat for a veto.

Meanwhile, tensions are flaring in the run-up to a possible nursing strike among the region’s major healthcare systems. Hospitals, derailed the by the surprise termination of a morally bankrupt spokeswoman,^[1] are on alert with a vote next week on whether to go ahead with what would be a major nursing walkout of an approximate 12000-member strong workforce. | LINK

She failed to disclose a prior conviction and reprimand from the South Dakota Board of Nursing for the embezzlement of funds from the HR department at her previous employer.

Judge: Nursing Strike Will Not Begin Tomorrow in California As Minnesota prepares itself for the “nursing strike of the...
Minnesota Nurses Overwhelmingly Reject Twin Cities Hospitals’ Proposals It’s being billed as the biggest nursing strike in this...
Nursing Strike Officially Concludes, Though Questions Remain Just as quickly as it had begun, the largest (one-day)...

Minn. Lawmakers Push Governor to Accept Latest Healthcare Budget Proposal as Clock Runs Down on Session

Michael Douglas, MD, MBA — Wed, 12 May 2010 20:54:36 +0000

The tail end of the legislative session is bringing with it high drama. With regard to healthcare legislation, recent good news came with the agreement of the state’s largest safety net hospital to take part in a completely taxpayer-subsidized healthcare delivery program. Unfortunately, that program is only part of the healthcare delivery story. Challenging the Democrat-controlled legislature is the possible executive veto of last-minute provisions that generally are characterized by expanding Minnesota’s Medicaid program.

Democratic lawmakers are hoping to pre-empt any kneejerk reaction by the governor by explaining its rationale for the plan,^[1] which they will hope change the governor’s reservations about the scope of state spending^[2] with the bill. It appears things once again come down to the governor’s veto power. Will he believe the Dems’ claims of lowered commitments to federal Medicaid funds to pay for healthcare, or will he stick to his guns, continuing his record on his brand of fiscal responsibility? | LINK

Gov. Pawlenty earlier estimated that the move would bring in about $900 million over the next three years until 2014 — using state-matched funds that would not be paid for by the federal government until then. This would create a significant burden for Minnesota’ s current budget. Pawlenty says it’s too steep.
Dem lawmakers say the overall cost to Minnesota is less than a third of that projection.

Healthcare Lawsuit Targets Minnesota Governor The process of unallotment[1] chosen by the governor of Minnesota...
Minnesota Lawmakers Recognize Urgency to Prevent Gap in Care to State’s Indigent In many ways, state governments offer political solutions and conform...
MN Legislature Passes Extension of Healthcare Safety Net for Poor, Governor Will Veto Minnesota Governor Tim Pawlenty is making good on his executive...