The huge drive to immunize the masses against threat of H1N1 in the 2009/10 influenza season (which the WHO has officially declared concluded) has created more than a watershed moment in 21st century public health response to a potential biological catastrophe, it has also touched off a political debate that’s just getting started. And it all has to do with authoritarian mandate of the vaccine for healthcare workers.

Contrary to popular thought, many healthcare workers do not receive the vaccine; in fact, approximately 40 percent of said workers actively refused [PDF link] the vaccine last year — during infection’s peak. This notion does not sit well with a couple of policy organizations — one academic and one medical. Both groups say mandatory influenza vaccine should be a condition of employment. The groups stress increased availability of the vaccine, a steadier supply of healthy workers to administer care in times of a crisis, and an overall decrease in the incidence of influenza-related deaths in already compromised inpatients with other medical problems.

Already, the state of New York is hard at work in developing regulatory actions for its public healthcare workers. | LINK

Related Posts Within Doctor Pundit:

1. Monday Newswire: MN’s First Influenza-A Case & More NY state recoups over half a billion dollars in amounts...
2. German Government Critic Alleges WHO Exaggeration of H1N1 Threat, Cites Oversupply of Vaccine Given time, anything can be politicized. Take the hysteria surrounding...
3. Report: Pharma Amplified Global H1N1 Scare What is known about the H1N1 epidemic that plagued the...
4. CDC Updates Projections on Influenza Deaths Just how effective are vaccines at keeping mass pandemics of...
5. Bill to Guarantee Healthcare to 9/11 First Responders Becomes Law Passing mostly along party lines, a bill that would guarantee...