State budgets are straining nationwide. Healthcare for the poorest citizens (children, the disabled, pregnant females, and poor elderly) and the ability to finance it has always been a political boilerplate, but — in a healthcare economy that will see looming crises in response to expected explosions in many of the the country’s neediest populations in the next 10 years — individual states are trying to get a handle on pre-empting the tsunami of expense.

There is legislative action in Congress that will make it possible to for the Medicaid program to cover nearly 20% (1 in 5) of Americans. Never mind the fact that the government chipped in almost 60% in total costs for Medicaid within the past year; the cost of expansion would mushroom to 90 percent^[1].

When one controls just for these variables, the issues of looming primary care provider shortages (to render the care that will overwhelm potential beneficiaries who sign up as a result of the expansion) and increased administrative costs to cover the expansion on the states’ end have yet to even be considered by many states. Dire, indeed. | LINK

1. The CBO projects states would pay about $33 billion. [↩]

Related Posts Within Doctor Pundit:

1. Obama Will Release $15 Billion from Federal Stimulus Package to States for Immediate Medicaid Funding in Two Days It’s official. Barack Obama will begin doling out the almost...
2. Discussions on Medicaid Funding and Sustainability on the Increase among States Medicaid has long been regarded as Medicare’s (ugly) stepchild, primarily...
3. States Look for Ways to Combat Imminent Medicaid Costs at Dawn of Reform Some states are using the issue as a campaign 2012...
4. HHS Gets Specific on States’ Needs in Face of Possible Cuts to Medicaid The Obama administration’s push to help cash strapped states weather...
5. States with a Budget in Place Have Cuts to Medicaid Provider Reimbursements in Common There seems to be a neverending chorus on how Medicaid,...