It’s the liberal wing of the Democratic party vs. the moderates. The issue is government’s reach in the delivery of healthcare — in particular, the issue of the public option. Liberals know that any sort of government plan — even a modicum more expansive than the rudiments of a public option — is essentially off the table. That’s why they’ve launched an ad campaign targeted at their Public Enemy #1, Senate Finance Chair Max Baucus. Although Baucus’s staff say that he is not intolerant of the public option, he supports the competition with Big Insurance at the hands of non-profit co-ops — something Insurance wants no part in.
Sens. Schumer (D-NY) and Rockefeller (D-WV) support government involvement in the form of a payment negotiating body and Medicare model for coverage, respectively.
And those moderates? They could be looking to Olympia Snowe (R-ME) who supports the use of a public option only as a threat — a stipulation for insertion into the healthcare marketplace only for non-compliant insurance companies which don’t keep their premiums “in check”, whatever that means.
Lawmakers get back to work today. | LINK
UPDATE: It appears as though those same liberals failed to get a public option in the Senate Finance version of the reform bill. | LINK
Related Posts Within Doctor Pundit:
- Sebelius: Public Option Now Not ‘Essential’ Is the public option dead? It appears as much. With...
- House (and Some Senate) Democrats Strive for Public Option in Spite of Obama Aides’ Downplays Yesterday, while this blog took some time off, healthcare’s political...
- White House Releases Statement on Public Option ‘Rumors’, Some Top Dems Unconvinced The President’s drive for a public option is rife with...
- Early Senate, WH Reaction to Reid Public Option Version Favorable Less than a couple hours after Senate Majority Leader Harry...
- Democrats Said to Have Reached Consensus As Public Option Provision Withers Democrats have just announced that a “broad agreement” has been...